Every good historian is almost by definition a revisionist. He looks at the accepted view of a particular historic episode or period with a very critical eye.
Paul Johnson
Every good historian is ...
Quotes from the same author
In the past, the U.S. has shown its capacity to reinvent its gifts for leadership. During the 1970s, in the aftermath of the Nixon abdication and the Ford and Carter presidencies, the whole nation peered into the abyss, was horrified by what it saw and elected Ronald Reagan as president, which began a national resurgence.
Paul Johnson
If you depart from moral absolutes, you go into a bottomless pit. Communism and Nazism were catastrophic evils which both derived from moral relativism. Their differences were minor compared to their similarities.
Paul Johnson
Scanning the newspapers and absorbing with a mixture of incredulity and indignation the enormities they report, I conclude that what England lacks today is, quite simply, sense.
Paul Johnson
His (Lenin's)humanitarianism was a very abstract passion. It embraced humanity in general but he seems to have had little love for, or even interest in, humanity in particular. He saw the people with whom he dealt, his comrades, not as individuals but as receptacles for his ideas. On that basis, and no other, they were judged. He judged man not by their moral qualities but by their views, or rather the degree to which they accepted his.
Paul Johnson
humanitarianism/&media=https://grindsets.com/fotos/ed/ed5bc092e2225b6dbc4e75538f0a3f49.webp&description=His+%28Lenin%27s%29humanitarianism+was+a+very+abstract+passion.+It+embraced+humanity+in+general+but+he+seems+to+have+had+little+love+for%2C+or+even+interest+in%2C+humanity+in+particular.+He+saw+the+people+with+whom+he+dealt%2C+his+comrades%2C+not+as+individuals+but+as+receptacles+for+his+ideas.+On+that+basis%2C+and+no+other%2C+they+were+judged.+He+judged+man+not+by+their+moral+qualities+but+by+their+views%2C+or+rather+the+degree+to+which+they+accepted+his.){kind=link}
If the decline of Christianity created the modern political zealot - and his crimes - so the evaporation of religious faith among the educated left a vacuum in the minds of Western intellectuals easily filled by secular superstition. There is no other explanation for the credulity with which scientists, accustomed to evaluating evidence, and writers, whose whole function was to study and criticize society, accepted the crudest Stalinist propaganda at its face value. They needed to believe; they wanted to be duped.
Paul Johnson
